Po to, kai rinkimų metuo Blinkevičiūtė melavo kad bus premjere, tikėjausi kad Paluckas viską darys tvarkingai; šalis galės koncentruotis į geopolitines grėsmes. Panašu kad to nebus. Ne tik konservaoriai, bet ir valstiečiai ragina Palucką atsistatydinti. Olekas pareiškė, kad jis pasiruošęs perimti premjero postą.
Gali būti, kad ant šito sprendimo kabo socialdemokratų likimas per ateinančius rinkimus.
Straipsnis čia. Panašu kad italai nori naudoti Ignalinoje panaudotą atominį kurą savo naujiems reaktoriams. Tas reiškia, kad italų Newcleo jau arti savo reaktoriaus komercializavimo. Labai įdomu.
Žemiau Matt Ferrell paaiškina, kodėl dabar rimti pingai eina į atomo energiją, o ne į 'atsinaujinančią' energiją iš vėjo ar saulės.
Labai įdomi paskaita apie LDK, kur istorija pasakojama iš taško kur apžvelgiami vikingų prekybos keliai ir Rusios susikūrimas. Man neteko iš Lietuvos istorikų girdėti apie vikingų įtaką LDK susikūrime, o T. Snyder apie tai pasakoja. Pavyzdžiui, kad pagrindinis vikingų prekybos kelias buvo Daugava (Dvina); kad vikingas labiau yra profesija o ne tautybė, kad vikingai mūsų kraštuose buvo genezė dabartinių čia gyvenančių tautų - skandinavų, baltų, finų, slavų ...
Anot jo, LDK yra tikrasis vikingų sukurtos Rusios tęsinys, kur buvo išlaikyta tradicija ir tikrasis tęstinumas; Maskovija buvo totorių vasalas, kurios valdovų vaikai turėdavo augti Sarajuje (Ordos sostinėje), pagal tų laikų paprotį ir kuri turi visai kitą valdymo tradiciją.
Kokia įdomi ta Lietuvos istorija.
Senokai ieškojau šios citatos. Nežinau ar ji yra I.Asimovo knygoje, bet TV seriale "Foundation" tikrai yra - epizodas 9.
Penas mintims ;)
<<
Ask a historian, "What was mankind's greatest invention?"
Fire? The wheel? The sword?
I would argue it's history itself. History isn't fact. It's narrative, one carefully curated and shaped. Under the pen strokes of the right scribe, a villain becomes a hero, a lie becomes the truth. What we choose to tell our children and what we censor. What we illuminate and what we gloss over. History as an act of addition and subtraction.
A wise man once said, "A people without history is like a tree without roots." What's missing from the wise man's history? When did story replace record?
When all the facts fall short of believability, fantasy feels reassuringly solid. And since this is my history, I get to decide which parts have been subtracted, which have been added.
History is the ultimate weapon, because it harnesses time itself. Used correctly, the past can alter the present.
What other invention can do that?
>>
Pasaulis keičiasi. Šiame straipsnyje Wolfgang Munchau rašo apie Kinijos galią. 2004 metais Kinijos ekonomika buvo kaip Italijos, šiuo metu ji yra antra pasaulyje po JAV.
Atominė energija, greitaeigiai traukiniai ir greitai augantis geležinkelių tinklas, skrydžiai į Kosmosą, industrinė galia ... Įspūdį daro progresas Dirbtinio Intelekto srityje, kur kai kas mano kad Kinija jau yra aplenkusi JAV. Dirbtinis intelektas ima daug elektros energijos, ir Kinija tam pasiruošusi.
Jei Lietuva nori atidaryti Dirbtinio Intelekto inovacijų centrą, ji turės pasirūpinti stabilia, gausia ir pigia elektros energija.
Daug peno mintims ...
Cituoju straipsnį ("Why China will win the arms race: It is streets ahead on AI", Wolfgang Munchau):
"But America also worries that they are leading the charge with AI-powered drones. We think of drones as modern, but those used in the Russia-Ukraine war still need an operator. Imagine, then, if one side had AI-powered drones at their disposal? The West and Nato may be comfortable in their current — swiftly dating — military capabilities. But AI warfare is a completely new game.
And China is already forging ahead in the two areas that will prove critical. The first is the supply of energy — which is vital to power large AI data centres. The West should be concerned by the sheer scale of the expansion of China’s energy capacity. China has a renewable capacity target of 2,461 gigawatts by 2030. The corresponding numbers for the EU and US are respectively 1,100 and 500 gigawatts. For the Chinese, the heavy lifting will come from renewable sources, such as the world’s largest hydropower plant in Tibet, which will have an energy capacity roughly the size of Germany’s capacity today. Just from one single dam. This dam is not even included in China’s target number."
<...>
"China, meanwhile, has more energy than we do, puts serious money into AI, and is not regulating itself to death. Take 5G. While we Europeans struggle with it, the Chinese are already developing 6G — the technology which is needed to handle the communications for next generation manufacturing.
This is the second critical area in which China is excelling: high-tech manufacturing. In the US and the UK, the prevailing view is that sophisticated countries should move into services and leave the shop-floor economy to upstarts like China. This is a story we have been telling ourselves for too long. And it is one that economists, in particular, don’t understand. They think it is more efficient to let China do all the manufacturing, for the US to specialise in high tech and finance, and to let Europe be a museum. They are simultaneously oblivious to those voters who want real jobs, to the nature of 21st-century manufacturing, and to security concerns.
The irony here is that the US understands the AI-service economy like no one else. And it still just about leads the world in research. But China has been able to catch up because all the new technology is open-source. As an anonymous employee at Google candidly admitted: “We have no moat, and neither does OpenAI.” Nor does the US. This is not a world of secret algorithms, or of industrial patents. The costs of entry are low — all you need is a bunch of desktop computers with a good graphics card. Anyone can join in. In the old world, the technology leadership meant that the US was years ahead of the competition. No more."
P.S. geras straipsnis apie Kinijos ir JAV palydovų kovas kosmose
